Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHURSHID versus FAZAL TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI

The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance Section 12 and 15 employees of the Ordinance terminated their services on charges of relying on the Inquiry Officer's report in which no evidence was recorded and Nor was the employee given the opportunity. The employer defended that the dismissal of the employees could be considered under section O12 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, in view of the fact that the employee's services were terminated due to mismanagement. Employee services were terminated. There was a regular charge sheet and an employee was deemed to be defective in this case under section O12 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance 1968, but not in section O15 of that ordinance. Employees are being investigated under Section 15 (4) as defective. (West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (CENT) and Orders) Ordinance, 1968 was not complied with, the order to terminate the employee was set aside and the employees were instructed to re-enter with benefits. Attend the service. best advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer