KHAISTA KHAN versus INDUS DYEING AND MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., HYDERABAD
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) Employee dismissed for employment was dismissed, but again by the Labor Court employer in compliance with the Labor Court order. The job was ordered to restore the job, but since vacancies for such winders were not vacant, the employee was asked to work on the seat of the auto cone winder because the person working on the seat was absent. The employee refused to work at the auto cone site despite the fact that both were unskilled workers. Not only did he refuse to work according to the employer's instructions, but he was absent for more than 10 days, disobeying the employer's orders and absent for more than 10 days, was rightfully dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Nilore lawyer
