Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQUARALI versus REGIONALCOMMISSIONEROFINCOME-TAX,LAHORE

Establishment of a Government Employee appointed as the Income Tax Inspector of the General Principles of Security, Annex I, Security Severity Rules, 1993, Rr 4 and 6 in the ASTA VCDE, was transferred to Lahore upon his request. Joined as Income Tax Inspector. The seniority list issued by the government employee of the authority was named after the co-operative government employees who were not working as income tax inspectors at the time of transfer of public servants to Lahore, but as an Income Tax Inspector. The development was given after which they were transferred after the transfer of public servant. The authority denied the claim of seniority of public servants in which the authority claimed that transfer of government employee from Karachi to Lahore would be equivalent to his initial appointment and that development would be done by the government employees. Will be holding the post. Through Rule 6 of the Sanitary Rules 1993, which provided that persons appointed by the transfer in a particular calendar year, by promotion or appointment for these employees, are senior to those appointed by the initial appointment in that year Will After his transfer from Karachi to Lahore, a civil servant could not be considered as a preliminary appointment because before his transfer he had a long career in credit and could not be banned from his junior position with these men. Is known to have developed during one year, when he was promoted to the post of public servants after being employed in Lahore. Recruiters who have been referred to as Income Tax Inspectors after promotion patent advocate from Gujranwala lawyer