MUHAMMADNAZIRRIZVI versus COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX,ZONEA,LAHORE
RR 5 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 3A (2), Provo (B) Short procedure for inquiry into service dismissal valid, authorized officer effect of officer authorized The source, although deciding which of the two was the discretion to be adopted, had to exercise such discretion with fair use of mind if inquiry was necessary in the interest of justice. Depending on the circumstances of each, no one could work against a civil servant for example. Which could only be established through evidence which was only possible in a regular inquiry where the appellant would have the opportunity, not only examining the 8F witnesses but also the leading evidence in denying the government's dismissal and the case. Was remanded to the concerned department with instructions. 5 and 6 of public servants, pursuant to the Rule (1973), and the end of the disciplinary proceedings, beginning fresh disciplinary proceedings against the public servant in connection with the same charges in terms of Rr. Pass the order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
