MASOODHAMEEDKHAN versus SECRETARY,MINISTRYOFHEALTH,ISLAMABAD
Section 8 (4) Civil Servants Rules, 1973, R 2 Seniority Determined Government Employees who challenged the Sanitary List in which their name was shown below the name of the co-public servant, initially of the Sindh Government. Under B17, he was appointed Medical Officer. About 18 years later, he was promoted to assistant professor at B18, and eventually rose to the rank of associate professor at B19, then to the post of associate professor at B19, the Federal Public Service Commission. Was advertised by a government employee who applied for it. The post and its recommendation were made by the Federal Public Service Commission and on this same post, the co-public servant also applied for a response to the Federal Public Service Commission's adverb against the direct post of Associate Professor at B19, but his request was rejected. Was done because they could not meet the needs. In this position a civil servant was recommended and the Federal Public Service Commission appointed another 19 as associate professor in D19. Rtment was already serving under the Sindh Government in the same position and grade while the co-official. The employee was serving as an assistant professor at B18, while before that he was a public servant senior, promoted to associate professor at B19 as a public servant. Co-Public Employee and Co-Public Employee who were found to be ineligible at the time of public employee development (or due to lack of development requirements) cannot be a Senior Employee Seniority List participant. The civil servant was appointed senior on the road
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Loralai lawyer