KHALIDWASEEM versus CHAIRMAN,NATIONALHIGHWAYAUTHORITY,ISLAMABAD
19, 20 (1) and 38 seniority government employees who challenged the seniority role in which they were shown under the name of another co-public employee, regularly for co-employee appointments about four years ago. Was assigned as a stenotype, whose appointment was otherwise. On the basis of work compensation, public servants were subsequently promoted as stenographers on a regular basis, while co-public servants were promoted as stenographers earlier than government employees, but their development as stenographers. The work was charge-based and not on a regular basis. Later, both public servants as well as co-public servants were permanently absorbed as stenographers on the same date as government employees, thus being regular stenotypes. As a regular promising stenographer, National Highway Authority Rules shall, under R 19 of 1995, entitle a co-employee to the civil service. The servant was not only assigned as a stenotype based on work charge, but also as a stenographer, his development was done on work charge B asis.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
