Section 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Conduct Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974, was presented as a witness on the appeal against the complainant's close relations that the recovery of the hatchet from the accused was suspected and was not put before the accused. Under section 2342, the CCP could not have disputed the dispute in ocular testimony, and medical evidence suggests that the incident did not occur as alleged by the prosecution during the incident. The injuries sustained by the accused were suppressed by the prosecution. It is highly suspected that one of the two parties launched the attack and injured the other, and in this case the suspect must benefit from the doubt. The Shariat court acquitted the accused after thorough scrutiny and review of the record and his order was absolutely correct. And according to the law, no interference is required. Appeal against the accused's behavior is rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
