Find a Lawyer

SAEEDASHRAF versus MUHAMMADASHRAFNADEEM

Articles 8 and 12 (a) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 (Pakistan), Article 212 (3) were challenged by the respondents in the appeal before the service tribunal on 29, 1993, under which their The sanity was restored and corrected. The Applicant's Appellate Vacation of Appeal was approved in the Graduation List to consider whether defendant's appeal before the Service Tribunal had not challenged the pre-1975 classification list on which 1981 was amended. If the defendants were promoted on the basis of a seniority and gradation list published in 1987, which was not challenged. And whether he failed to clear the Federal Public Service Commission or, under section 12 (a), the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and failed the previous entry test, did not formally appoint him as deputy secretary. Therefore, he could not do so under Section 8 (4), the Civil Servants Act of 1973, regularly claiming sanity over those people. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chunian lawyer