Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SOHAIL versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

Border Engineering Service (Building and Road Department, Irrigation Department and Public Health Engineering Department) Rules 1973 Act as interpreting these evidence (1984, 10 of 1984), Arts 55 and 56 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3). Born N: WFP Engineering Services (Building and Roads Department, Irrigation Department and Public Health Engineering Department) Rules, 1973, and on the question of whether engineers working in the C&W Department and the Central Design Office belong to a cadre. Or two cadre employees of one of the aforementioned departments filed an appeal before the service tribunal in which he The government welcomed the border government as a defendant without imposing any person and claimed that the design office was not independent or separate cadre The service tribunal accepted the said employee and the government filed the border service. The Supreme Court dismissed the request for leave to appeal against the tribunal's order, according to the decision or order of the service tribunal that obtained the final status, a stable sanity of engineers working in the C&W Department and the Central Design Office. The list was notified Applicants filed Appeals Department and seniority mentioned Challenge and then sit back service. In the case in which the tribunal was dismissed, the applicants were allowed to appeal in the Supreme Court in order to consider the question as to whether a government employee of the Border Department was against the border. The appeals filed by an employee were not parties to the service tribunal. Similar case and then before the Supreme Court, in which A.K. immigration advocates from Noor kot lawyer