SAFDARALIMALIK versus ESTATEOFFICERGOVERNMENTOFPAKISTAN,ISLAMABAD
Article 4 (185 ()) Termination of Allotment of Government Employees Home The constitutional application against the cancellation of the allotted house by legitimate public servants was dismissed on the basis that the terms and conditions of the alleged cancellation service were violated. Employees are treated and not treated by the Tribunal. The High Court of Appeal approved the consideration of the appeal, even in view of the Supreme Court's decision in 1989, SCMR 1948 (which stated that government employees were given allotment / quarterly / housing service to government employees. Period) was a non-controversial decision of the High Court in accordance with the law. Article 185 Government Employee Allot House Cancellation High Court rejects constitutional request for non-availability of jurisdiction of public servants Another quarterly allotment by a public servant was, in fact, admitted by the public servant ? The due date report is further acknowledged by the government employee in his letter to the State Office, the officiating public servant acknowledging the contents of the said document, saying that it was made to sign those documents and that Had not occupied the quarters yet if the civil servant had not yet occupied the allotted quarter, he could do so now, however, the appeal had lost its significance and was dismissed, having been disallowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
