Find a Lawyer

PIRMUHAMMADQURESHI,PRINCIPAL,TECHNICALTRAININGINSTITUTE,WAHCANTT. versus CHAIRMAN,P.O.F.BOARD,WAHCANTT

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Initially, the service tribunal ordered the removal of the negative remarks against the petitioner in the appeal filed by him and the remarks promotion not suitable for development on his own turn. And accepted the applicant as well. Against the appeal of the promotion, in the promotion of supersession and ordered that when his next junior was promoted to the Supreme Court, it would be promoted, however, the federation filed an appeal to the tribunal on appeal from the service tribunal. Has been ordered to do. After the applicant / appellant included the names of other government employees who were affected by the decision in favor of public servants, the government employees, on the direction of the Supreme Court, amended their appeal and the aforementioned government in the order of the remand service tribunal. Employers 'names, however, dismissed civil servants Applicants' right to dismiss the employer's appeal was the reason that the authorities did not recognize the correct AC in certain years of government service. NT But he decided on his old Remarks promotion not suitable for promotion, and thus he was not considered for promotion. That the respondent public servant did not do the relevant course, therefore, he was not eligible for promotion. online advocate from Washuk lawyer