Find a Lawyer

AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD JAMAL

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) and 20 End of Service The textile mills' weaving department describes the services of employees working in different capacities, without notice and without any order. Done. The termination of the job challenged the employee's dismissal that since the employer employed the contractor through the contractor, the owner of the mill was not responsible for the compliance of the Standing Order rules. , But the contractor himself was responsible for the same dispute raised by the employer. It was repulsed in view of the fact that although the employees were hired by the contractors, it was a labor contract because the mill unit was not provided on contract basis, the specialist was the unit in charge of the raw material. Was responsible for delivering. And other services such as electricity, water, gas, telephone, etc.: Con tractor which provided only wages, was not liable for profit and loss nor was the contractor of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. Were responsible for the O20 ban, the employees whose services were terminated verbally were ordered. To be reinstated by the Labor Court with payment of back privileges lawer from fb area from Ahmadpur East lawyer