Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A Labor Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (n) Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Section 2 (b) Employees who maintain complaints petitions Were working. In charge of railways, electricians and assistants receiving more than 2,000 rupees due to electrical foreman and their salaries, they did not fall under the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, where the maximum salary. 1500 rupees was not done by the employee. Under the Factories Act, 1934, and the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the definition of 'labor of' was not even answered by the workers' complaint filed by such employees, other than their salaries, but it As a civil servant, you can resolve your own from the Departmental Services Tribunal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Khanqah Dogran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.