DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A Labor Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (n) Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Section 2 (b) Employees who maintain complaints petitions Were working. In charge of railways, electricians and assistants receiving more than 2,000 rupees due to electrical foreman and their salaries, they did not fall under the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, where the maximum salary. 1500 rupees was not done by the employee. Under the Factories Act, 1934, and the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the definition of 'labor of' was not even answered by the workers' complaint filed by such employees, other than their salaries, but it As a civil servant, you can resolve your own from the Departmental Services Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Hattian lawyer
