Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Constitution Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 22 Qatil Ahmed and rejection of terrorist evidence, death sentence reduced to life imprisonment ? There was no objection to the double murder identification parade, the trial court sentenced the accused to the absence of the accused and sentenced him to death on two counts while the co-accused was sentenced to life imprisonment on two counts. The High Court acquitted both the accused but the prosecution witnesses were sentenced to the legal punishment of the accused. There were independent witnesses who had no motive in engaging the perpetrators in the case and identified the 27 accused in the identity parade. No objection was raised during the identification parade of the accused that the accused was arrested before the identification parade was shown to the witnesses. On 16 2 2001, it was sent to the judicial lockup on 17 2 2001 and the identification parade was made on 22 2 200 1 and both courts rightly relied on the identification test parade involving the participation of the witnesses. The statements were supported by the fact that the accused's name was mentioned as a suspect without any delay. On the offer of the suspects from his residence, the witnesses were further argued with the recovery of the blood-stole theft and the case against the suspects proved beyond any doubt; both courts supported the involvement of the accused. He was, therefore, properly punished under this. There was no instability or unlawful action in the decision of section 2302 (b), PPC and to that extent, the complaint in its statement under section 154
