Sections 12 and 27 (b) Convene Evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 17, 79 and 81 suit for specific performance of the contract Two witnesses, non-production of sack fraud buyer for notice without notice, proof of contract entered Effective Plaintiff Demands Implementation Of The Contract The suit was dismissed by the trial court and the lower appellate court for sale by the defendant, but the High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff in his written statement acknowledged the agreement to sell the contract in question so that the initial beginner to prove it, the sincere buyer, later appeared as a witness during the trial of the transfer father and claimed it. That he had initiated a bargaining agreement / contract and that he was aware of the sale agreement between the claimant and the defendant, subsequently failed to remove his initial position. Request / Tip. In favor of and was not entitled to equal doctrine, Supreme Court refused to intervene High Court's appeal dismissed decision and order
