Article 199 A state-owned bid auctioned, the provincial government-owned extant suit property was auctioned by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction over the discretion of the arbitral authority to interfere with such arbitration. Bid was offered at Rs 21,500 per suit for Marla, the highest bidder district housing committee (housing committee) on record, however, decided it was below Rs 22,000. Neither bid would be accepted, after which the plaintiff approached the District Services Committee (Service Committee). The Saeed Committee recommended that the plaintiff be allowed to increase the bid amount by Rs. 24000 per marl and accept it, however the Housing Committee did not agree with the Committee's recommendation and decided that the plaintiff should auction the property. To be put to The decision of the Housing Committee through a civil suit before the trial court which, in its favor, the Court of Appeal upheld, however, overturned the findings of the trial court High Court, That the authorized authority may reject any bid during the proceedings without assigning any reason. The auction notice states that acceptance of a higher bid will be subject to approval by a competent authority. The auction notice states that the authorized authority was the Housing Committee High Court while the appellate court did not review the effect of the terms and conditions overturning the decision. The exercise of discretion by the relevant auction authorities was not enforceable in the writ jurisdiction (High Court) unless it had any of the fundamental rights, arbitrary, hypothetical or vacuous.
