Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 Wage Commission Award (1984), Para 145 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Employees have been requested to exercise their right to appoint children of deceased employees with whom The CBA had sought guidance from the National Industrial Commission, according to the Relations Commission's impression that the employer was banned from conducting tests and interviews for the appointment of children of the deceased employees of the bank. Their legitimate rights of appointment were also ignored and the recruitment of cashiers and guards by the bank has also been announced. In connection with the violation of the Wage Commission Award, instructions were sought that the bank should ensure the protection of legal rights under applicants under the Wage Commission Award as well as the various rights settlements between the parties on different occasions. The ban should be fully covered by the applicants' demands. Under paragraph 145 of the Wage Commission Award, Chaudhry obtained the right of the applicant that the employer bank had the right to violate the provisions of Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan under which the equality of the law was guaranteed. Yes, they were misleading because the applicant did not violate any constitution of Pakistan, because the applicant was looking for it. Implementation of the right granted to it by the Law Wage Commission Award and other settlements, equality before the law will not mean that no person has any legal rights under any law enforcement award, lawyer settlement. Can be immigration advocates contact from Umer Kot lawyer