ALL PAKISTAN POSTMAN AND LOWER GRADE STAFF UNION versus ALL-PAKISTANPOSTAL EMPLOYEES UNION
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 EE, in its application, determined the collective bargaining unit applicant to constitute another Collective Bargaining Unit (CBU) in the Establishment where we already had four CB applicants. It was the employees who were performing their duties in the establishment. The Grade 1 to Grade 6 was excellent staff and their functions and duties were very different from the duties and duties of the other staff in the Establishment. Thus all the employees from Grade 1 to Grade 6 had to establish separate CBU. Whether the employees' grades 1 through 6 were generally provided by the Establishment and were referred to as liver staff, thus distinguishing between liver and non-liver staff. Philosophy hy philosophy between liver or non-liver staff or grade 1. There was no legal justification for the grade between the 6 staff and the other upper staff because it was neither reconciliatory nor valid. Section 22 did not comply with the requirement of the EE, nor did it find any definite basis for the formation of a new CBU, in the absence of evidence that the collective bargaining unit between the liver and the non-liver Without discrimination, this would not have been possible and apart from this: the application for the creation of a new CBU by the applicants, from grade 1 to 6 and other staff advanced, could not be accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
