MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus CHAIRMAN, WAPDA
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) The practice of unfair practice by employees who were former employees who were terminated from work was considered to be entitled to rent a house according to their new class and the employer. The homeowner paid the rent. Then the high rate of rent Later, when, on the recommendations of the Estimates Committee, the employees were evacuated to obtain accommodation according to the new party, the employer sought to recover the rent amount from the employees, which the owner desired. Given to the landlord, even though the employer's payment for such recovery was unlawful, the process could not be interpreted as unfair labor by employers, especially But when there was no evidence from him, nor did the employees prove to be so on record as the documentation presented by the employees Vita was silent on this point. Employees failed to prove unfair labor practices by employers; holding petition was not feasible in this regard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer
