AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MEHER-UN-NISA QADRI
Article 44 & A and Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Code of Conduct, R,, RR, 33, and 36 & Azad 38 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Institution of Petitions and Grants of Right Rules, 1975, Rr 3 , 4 and 6 Written Appeals Registered before the High Court Regular hearing of the petitioner without admitting the writ petition for the regular hearing and not seeking the opposition party was dealt with by directing that the respondent The Authority will advertise these positions along with it and applicants will not be disturbed till then. The court did not recognize the writ petition for the regular hearing and neither asked the defendants. And under the provisions of Rules 33 to 38 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Procedure Rules 1984, the respondents were heard condemned, when a writ petition was filed, it would be placed before the bench, if it was summarily dismissed. Was not excluded, and the bench also admitted. For regular hearing, then notice will be issued to the other party, which will require the filing of counter affidavits, documents, objections / written statements, the applicant, if required, the affidavit with the permission of the court and any You can resubmit the document. After hearing the parties, the court may pass a proper order on the writ petition. The final settlement of the writ petition was not covered without formal confession for regular hearing, as well as the Rules 3 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Institute of Institution. , 4, 6, was also called. The Writing Rules, 1975 grant, whenever a writ petition was granted before a division bench or single bench, could be summarily dismissed. And if it is not rejected then
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
