Find a Lawyer

NAZAR KHAN versus MST. HASSAN BEGUM

Section 100 Second Appeal The High Court will not interfere with such findings in the absence of evidence of false reading or the absence of available evidence on record. Which has been accused of such false advertising. Similarly

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• Mst. SARDAR BEGUM v. REHMAT KHAN 2013 CLC 839
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF CHOUDHRY v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU 2013 PLC(CS) 844
• Mst. MEHR NISHAN v. NIAZ MUHAMMAD 2013 YLR 871
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. ABDUL MANNAN 2013 CLC 910
• FINANCE DEPARTMENT through Secretary v. TARIQ ZIA ABBASI 2013 PLC(CS) 918
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI 2013 PLC(CS) 934
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. Sahibzada Raja MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN 2013 YLR 969
• Mst. ATTIQA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ KHAN 2013 MLD 978

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Chicha watni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes