CH. FATEH JANG versus THE PUNJAB ELECTION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE
The important relief of the applicant is that the representation of Article 68 of the People's Act 1976 and the dispute of 69 regarding the counting of wrongful and illegitimate votes in which re-counting without mentioning corrupt and illegal practices has been made. On the basis of this he has been selected as the candidate rather than the back candidate. Under Form XVI A (Section 69, Representatives Public Act, 1976 produced by the Assistant Returning Officer, a stable result), in no case was the case registered that the applicant had allegations of illegal and malicious activity. And in case of provocation when the returning candidate was to be declared invalid under Section 6868, the satisfaction of the Election Tribunal was the only requirement for such relief and the dispute between competing forms was only for Form XVI A ( Sheets of interim) and can be determined only by re-counting entries in Form XVI. B (Final result by Returning Officer) varies substantially
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
