Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH MUSHTAQ ALI versus MIAN MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN WATTOO

Representing the Public Act 1976, the section 14 nomination papers were tried on the basis that the candidate did not behave harshly, honestly, nor honestly nor in public meetings while serving as the Chief Minister. Demonstrated dishonesty of the judiciary by not taking effective measures to prevent the. The statement was made before the court, raising the slogan against the judiciary during the hearing of the petition to dissolve the provincial assembly and dissolving the provincial assembly within 7 minutes of hearing the petition filed against the dissolution of the assembly candidate. That they have given much respect to the judiciary. : Never considered contempt of the judiciary and have taken all legal steps to prevent and hold meetings which were held by angry persons during the hearing of the petition. The objections failed to provide any positive evidence on record that the candidate had exercised executive authority. As such, none of the political leaders of the party who participated in the events at the relevant time in the political arena, as far as the province is concerned, the practice of obstruction of executive authority by the Federation or the practice of prejudice. It was disqualified or prevented from participating in the election, this will not happen. Objections against the nomination papers for the sole and independent candidate and the candidate to contest it were rejected. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mangla lawyer