Find a Lawyer

SARDAR WAJID ALI versus HAMID NASIR CHATTHA

Candidates for rejecting the nomination papers of Section 14 of the People Act 1976 were tried to reject the nomination on the basis that the candidates were not eligible to contest the membership of the Majlis Shura because they did not have Shariah beards and Such candidates were neither competent to accept the testimony of the Supreme Court, nor could they be accepted because no Islamic State's Ulu Lamar was ever imposed on a person who did not raise a beard to contest the elections. The nomination papers cannot be rejected and candidates are not allowed to participate. Can be given. According to Sharia, the choice not to blow a beard, when no evidence was presented against any of the candidates, or even before the returning officer, it was alleged that any of them had committed a major sin. Except that none of them had made a beard candidate. The conditions for contesting elections cannot be disqualified and their papers cannot be rejected because they were deserted because they did not have to wear a shark beard. law websites from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer