Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT LALIKA versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL CHAN

Representation of the People Act 1976 The nomination of Section 14 papers was tried to reject the nomination papers, since the candidate did not deposit the security deposit at the time of filing the nomination papers. This candidate submitted papers as cover candidate for some other candidate, and the candidate who submitted papers for the National Assembly seat also submitted papers for the Provincial Assembly seat record. It appears that the candidate deposited security money at the time of submission of papers. The nomination of the candidate's papers cannot be ruled out, even if he had submitted papers for both the National Assembly and the Provincial Assembly and he was the coaching candidate, it was the responsibility of the Returning Officer to see that the papers were in order. Or not and this candidate was disqualified for some other reason. The candidate is otherwise eligible to contest the election and his papers are in order; his papers cannot be rejected for nomination appellant. online advocate from Ukba lawyer