DILAWAR MAHMOOD versus BABU MUHAMMAD MUNIR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 62 Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Sections 14 and 99 of the Punjab Undesired Cooperative Society (dissolution) Act (of 1993), Section 18 rejected the nomination papers of the nominees who were accepted by the Returning Officer. Was. An attempt was made to dismiss on the basis that the candidate was the director of the cooperative society, which failed to return the depositors' money, and as a result the candidate of the unwanted society pleaded in defense that it was merely the fact that he was the director. There was a society that was declared unpopular, there was none. His papers are the basis for the rejection of the nomination because he has not taken any loan from any bank or institution nor claimed a predetermined candidate, even if it is believed that the cooperative society returned the deposits. Failure to do so, cannot be blamed on the shoulders. To be the director of its directors, officers and unwanted co-agents, the candidate's operative societies are considered to misuse funds, assets and society property, unless the contrary is proved. The candidate, who was the director of the society, cannot be relieved of the responsibilities and responsibilities. As one of the directors of the candidate society, the trustee and trustee of the trust had the right to stop working and to disapprove. Was announced, showing that the directors and other shareholders were their own users N deposit were unable to fulfill his duty to return and the trustee had proven unreliable and poor Amen hope
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Larkana lawyer