Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANEES versus ABDUL QAYYUM ALIAS KALLA KHAN

Section 497 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the appeal to the Supreme Court for the cancellation of Section 42 bail was made, and a number of prosecution witnesses were examined, and only a few individuals were examined. It is not advisable to send the accused behind bars. Since it will not serve any useful purpose, especially when no allegation is made that the accused has been protected from misuse of bail privileges.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• TAHIR MAHMOOD v. WAHEED AHMAD 2013 CLC 616
• FAISAL AMEEN v. GHULAM HUSSAIN AWAN 2013 PLC(CS) 619
• MUHAMMAD BASHARAT v. Syed SAQIB SHAH 2013 PCrLJ 619
• ABDUL REHMAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 CLC 719
• Raja SHAHNAWAZ KHAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 728
• MUSHTAQ AHMED v. MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MIRPUR 2013 CLC 734
• ISTIKHAR HUSSAIN v. SHAHBAZ 2013 YLR 747
• Ch. GHALIB HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2013 MLD 749

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

power of attorney advocate Gari Habibullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes