O VII, R 11 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Trial Scope and Rejection of Rules The trial court observed that the plaintiff in the trial case, The prayer was vague and the prayer for it was amended under section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, for the purpose of amending the record of the revenue, and the trial court dismissed the trial as a hearing. The plaintiffs filed a second appeal to the High Court, which was successful, and the High Court, through unanimous decision, set aside the decisions of the courts and The trial court was remanded on the issue of trial and merits, the contents of the disputed and recognized material or the legal documents may be considered, but the legal provisions clearly clarify the plaintiff's case and clarify the substance in the present case. Explained, it was revealed that the parties contradicted the question of reality. In cases where the evidence cannot be resolved without being recorded, the jury was not justified in rejecting, under O VII, R 11, CPC, the main content of the plaintiff's contents, Or had to be careful. The strange facts of this case, some of the controversial or recognized material or documents, were made available, which could be considered a part of the spectrum according to the nature of the plains' history, under O VII, R 11, CPC. It may also be noted that the plaintiff can be dismissed only if all the reliefs were claimed, withheld under the law, if some of the claimed relief was available, one of the relief aid Bunny
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
