AXX, R 5 and O XLI, R 31 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Case 12 The trial court's decision on the performance of a contract decision by the first appellate court dismissed the case and appealed before the appellate court. Also, the High Court accepted that the appeal against the decisions and orders of the courts below was based on the fact that the decision of the Appellate Court below was not in accordance with the provisions of OX, CPC and the case was freshly decided in the trial court. The remand for the hearing was obtained. Recording of the decision by the trial court, while the first appellate court was to record the judgment in light of O XLI, R 31, CPC Order XLI, R 31, the CPC held that the first appellate court was separate on all matters. It would record separate results, but it was not a complicated rule. If a matter can be resolved to become a bone of contention between the parties, then there was no need to record every case under the appellate court. The three cases were collectively in the opinion of the appellate court. All three cases were co-ordinated and the burden was on the plaintiff on the same issue. The appellate court was correct in recording the results on all three cases, collectively the High Court, Facts and matters without passing a telegraphic decision. The Appellate Court did not pass judgment and did not consider the law because the application of the OX, R5, CPC was not in the first appellate court case, the extinction decision, in the circumstances, was not a decision in the eyes of the court. Had to decide the case on merit The unclean verdict was set aside and in this case the Supreme Court decided for a merit
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
