Section 5, Schedule and Section 7 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Procedure Rules, 1998, Rr 3, 4 and 5 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 suit which upheld the marriage filed by the husband. That is, both the Marriage Jurisdiction Debate, the trial court and the Shariah court had claimed legality for the marriage in favor of the marriage by the plaintiff's husband; the lawyer for the defendants claimed that the marriage Only one woman can file a case of interest, and the husband cannot sue. Under R5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Procedure Rules 1998, the court had exclusive jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide on the matters listed in the schedule. And the Schedule to Marriage Issue 7 had the exclusive jurisdiction to decide on the family court's decision to resolve the obstruction, the term marriage can have broader implications than simplicity, and it does not appear to be a spouse or a third party. The source makes a claim. Denying the marriage between the alleged husband and wife, and engaging in an action by the spouse against each other, or by the spouse against a third party suit, other than the spouse in the case Can be filed by person. Spouses must be filed against third parties to prevent them from marrying. The person may claim that a woman was not his wife or the wife may claim that he is not the defendant's wife and he will refrain from such claim. , In the plaintiff's claim that a woman is his legally married wife and the other person, the plaintiff is entitled to a prohibited decree suit.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
