Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) appeal against the conviction of Qatil MM was not actually named in the FIR; several persons were arrested during the investigation, But he was later pronounced dead, the victim had given this statement to his mother, but his statement was recorded before the deceased police statement under Section 161, CR PC. Was not, in the circumstances, could not be relied upon as not proved by any cautious and concrete evidence. After receiving information about the victim's death, the FIR. He himself was not a witness to the incident and was merely an informant. And that statement can be described as evidence of a hearing, which cannot be considered as evidence in the eyes of the law, is abusive, cannot be considered sufficient to convict an accused. The incident was a dark night and a prosecution witness said he was there. There is no source of light on the roof of the underground house, and otherwise it was humanly impossible to identify a person from a distance so that the statements of the prosecution's witnesses were not without doubt and the possibility of the accused being falsely implicated Also cannot be ruled out. The gun in which the gun was recovered also caused serious suspicion, until his decision was found to be misleading, arbitrary, surprising and devious. The courts were always reluctant to intervene in the matter, all the prosecution witnesses were close relatives and their statements were reliable and inspirational and true.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
