Find a Lawyer

SAID MUHAMMAD versus MUNAWAR

Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the High Court's appeal against ocular evidence was inconsistent with the medical evidence, the deceased suffered severe injuries and was required to make a coherent statement during the recording. Are very sad in their abilities. The FIR was suspicious and no attempt was made to obtain a formal declaration of death through the magistrate's appearance of his own armed suspect with a gun at the police post, which was not supported by any independent evidence which was supported by the High Court. The defendant's immunity was not endorsed. Under the circumstances, the benefit of the doubt was not open to interference with the material on record and was perfectly compatible with the safe administration of criminal justice. jobs for advocates from Kandiaro lawyer