SAEEDUL HASSAN, EX-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 3 The removal of a civil servant on the basis of a permanent reputation of being corrupt, the four officers whose duty was to monitor the punctuality, integrity and proper government employee. Witnesses against the district included the work of all district judicial officers and courts if during the performance of such duty, such officers could form opinions about their partner (civil servant) unless demonstrated to be effective. A case of alleged, discriminatory or encouraging such was not found to test the merits of such officers. Referring to the ACR or reporting to a visiting High Court judge was a baseless test record or a report to be made when it came to concrete matters. Not just a matter of dignity, but a solid case for presenting and maintaining
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
