Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus DEVLIKUND FOREST AND MULTIPURPOSES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

Arbitration Act 1940 Section 34 Clause of Contract Arbitration Excludes certain matters from the jurisdiction of arbitration, providing for exploitation by respondents of a certain amount of trees between the parties, after allegedly marking trees and markers. Appellants withholding relevant field book issued and respondents after continuing the work order and exploitation work continued Appellants to file suit against the appellants for permanent order dismissal 34, to file an application under the Arbitration Act is to stay on this matter. The arbitrator in the agreement was cited for all disputes arising under the agreement as well as appeals from the Supreme Court through the Appellate and Review Court, the allegations leveled by the appellant in the immunity petition. The arbitration clause I dealt with was clearly excluded from the judgment in the agreement and since the agreement specifically provided for the cutting of the tree, which was not marked by the appellant. Gone, unauthorized tree cutting dispute could not be referred to arbitration That was it. As the High Court rightly refused to interfere with the finding of the courts below patent advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer