Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Anonymous Plaintiffs filed a claim against the plaintiff for a claim of ownership of the land in the suit, which shows that the plaintiff was the co-buyer of the land and Many purchases also include purchases made by defendants. But since they were not fiduciary, the entire land was purchased in the name of the defendants because Banimaidar Plante specifically alleged that the defendants had paid a proportionate share in the sale case and had been bought on the spot by the defendant. Their share of the property was also occupied. Permanently in the possession of the same plaintiff, allegedly contacted the defendant to correct the revenue entries in his favor, but he (the defendant) withheld them on the basis that a civil suit was pending and Following his decision, the required changes to the revenue record would be affected and he acknowledged his ownership through the written process, but the trial court nevertheless dismissed the plaintiff's claim and the district judge ruled the trial. In keeping with the order of the court, the High Court accepted the respondents' request for review and said that the courts were important documents and in-laws below. And had ignored the evidence of the defendant's uncle that the plaintiff had purchased the suit land in the name of the plaintiff and had been in possession of it since its purchase and had paid the same price as other witnesses. That the defendant was hanged. A document that appeared by one of them stated that the defendant and his Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khuzdar lawyer