Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD LUQMAN versus MUHAMMAD ARIF QURESHI


A. XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 of the Rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1984, R 34 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 by issuing a classification by the High Court to the defendant. Partially instructs to enter comments on. The validity of the application was not a good and healthy process of ordering the status quo without the High Court recognizing such a request for a regular hearing. The High Court was legally obliged to answer the respondents for 7 days. Issue notice or dispense with the RJ34 requirement. The Kashmir High Court Rules, 1984 High Court issued the status quo without considering the preliminary case, balance of facility and irreparable loss, without fulfilling the conditions of AX Xinemix, RR 1 and 2. The order was approved, the CPC was not bad in law nor the Supreme Court upheld the unrelated order of the situation.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Baroute lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.