Find a Lawyer

WARYAM versus M.B.R.

Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Proprietary Rights Claims relating to the constitutional jurisdiction of the claimant claimed that the property rights in the dispute are subsidiary tenants. The cultivation of the land in dispute through notification must be made before 1977, while the applicant started cultivating it in 1979. The courts had simultaneously found that the applicant's case did not fall within the scope of the notification and that the applicant's case could not be all tenant. As a regular lease officer, he is superior to those who could not appear in the notification clause because he is not entitled to claim the transfer of land in the dispute, nor in this case any of the harmonization orders. Was found to be illegal. Cannot interfere with the orders of the following courts as per the law: High Court Constitutional Jurisdiction tax advocates from Kotli lawyer