SHAMEER versus MEMBER, COLONIES BOARD
The ratification of the Food Scheme in Sections 10 and 30 of the Government Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, confirmed the name of the allottee, which disposed of the land under the scheme which was regularly allocated under the scheme. Had paid the full price after the deal was executed, and the allotment was later canceled in the name of it, and upon request of the informant, the land in dispute was resumed, who would otherwise have no Luxury Standby. There was no need to enforce, because the land in the conflict is within the bounds of the municipality, yet it is clearly stated In the land allotted / Transfer Order was not in conflict zone at the time of proprietary rights, to resume the land in dispute, can not be sustained on the basis of incorrect assumptions of fact.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kasur lawyer
