Find a Lawyer

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus M.B.R

Section 36 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 (1973), Article 199 The petitioner was appointed by the collector only on the basis of the caste and the defendant was neglected even though he had better qualifications. However, the collector order was confirmed by the commissioner. But it was set aside by the Member, Board of Revenue, who appointed the defendant in view of his qualification, the respondent was not only better educated than the applicant, but more property than the applicant. The defendant was also a very influential person because he was a member of the Cooperative Development Society and a member of the Shirk Committee, the Director of the Board of Revenue, the Zakat Committee, which cannot be called upon without any consent or jurisdiction. , Especially when it was not a victim. Legal weakness immigration advocates email from Hariwala lawyer