MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MUTALLI
1908 Section 115 of the Code of Conduct, the trial court decided two cases against the plaintiffs / applicants, but the Court's finding below on these matters was cross-examined in the appeal filed by the defendants / defendants. Was not challenged by the. Decided against them or in support of the original court's decision in the first court of appeals, nor challenged the results of the following two courts on the two issues that were filed by them in the High Court petitioners. The memorandum submitted in the petition, in these circumstances, was not entitled to question him personally. These two issues confirm the conclusions of the two courts below, in view of the fact that when the first appellate court did not raise or appeal a particular point, that party was present before the second appellate court on that point. Was not entitled to lift or request. Or the reviewing court, except that the question of jurisdiction or the question of law raised on the fact entered / proved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Khanqah Dogran lawyer