SPINZER TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD. versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION
Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Jurisdiction Contractor Applicant A travel agent sought the impression that the defendant Pakistan International Airline paid the applicant from the payment commission on a fuel surcharge submitted by the applicant. Discussed the airline's request. The surcharge was part of the rent and therefore the applicant had the right to receive commissions on the same hold, the agreement between the parties was not a standard contract approved by the ITA, and the rights, promises, promises and obligations of the contract Obligations cannot be interfered with using constitutional jurisdiction, while constitutional petitions that are not appropriate for enforcement of contractual obligations such as cases in ordinary jurisdiction courts have not been filed to enforce contractual remedies. However, the High Court observed that the applicant was present at liberty in search of Liga If legal support is available from the authorized forum, then the constitutional application was dismissed according to the law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
