ZAHID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN SALEEM VATO CEO, NOWSHEHRA CANTT
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application In addition to confirming the request for assistance from the court on the basis of the illegal settlement possession group and the evidence of the occupants of the land, the complainant has a baseless and uncertain and doubtful trial. There was no evidence. In the absence of any material record to disclose the criminal intentions of the accused, any justification for any confession, the trial court was not obliged to pursue the matter without issuing an order of inquiry and inquiry and May revoke it and fail to disclose any illegality without the defendant being summoned. Act or criminal intention, on the basis of the conditions for the offense to be constituted under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 On the day of the incident, the complainant did not have actual physical and legal possession of the disputed property and the accused party S refusal to create controversy trial in the High Court decision in the Court approved the petition was dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
