Section 302 (b) Convene Testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 3 and 150 Definition of Evidence Testimony Benefits of Doubt Enemy Witness and Child's Witness Identification Cost Prosecution Case primarily linked to testimony of adolescent witness and child witness Is. The evidence of the admissible witness could not be relied upon at all, but his testimony had to be considered, carefully and carefully investigated for the truth of such testimony to be complied with by independent means of collusion and the rest of the evidence. In the absence of sovereign statement, the basis of the conviction of the accused should not be considered as such witness had to decide on the internal value of such testimony and it is not safe to rely on the statement of the child's witness. That is, until the rule of rule is confirmed. It should also be noted that the child's evidence did not include the coaching factor, in the present case no piece of evidence was presented. There was no comprehensible justification on record by the prosecution to support the statements of the two witnesses, as the prosecution after confirming the testimony of the complainant and the other prosecutor to another inmate in the complainant's home. Did not test. The change in the preliminary version of any other prisoner in the house by the prosecution, and the complainant, will not only show the credibility of his testimony seriously, but also about the accuracy of the subsequent version. Will create reasonable doubt. The concurrent death sentence set by the prosecution, one of the prosecution's witnesses, who was a natural witness, and not related to the complainant or the detainee, was dismissed, saying the victim committed suicide.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
