Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN SHAH versus MST. KALSOOM

Section 13 students, nameless witnesses of the non-Jewish name, lost the competitor of the student motive and the first moabit, who was fatal to the right of acquittal. Had demonstrated. And all of the studies were made prior to the mutation of cooperation, there was no certified jumping claim in favor of the plaintiff; The statements of the plaintiff's witnesses were on record which could not be termed "trivial" for the purpose of premature confrontation. Reading the wrong evidence and not reading the evidence were on record. Orders placed separately were rejected Rejected to review conditions \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• Mrs. NAHEED KAMAL AZFAR v. G.D.A. 2015 CLC 282
• KAKI v. AQLEEMUN 2015 CLC 290
• MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. TAHIR ADAM 2015 YLR 308
• ZAHID HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD HASSAN SALEEM VATO CEO, NOWSHEHRA CANTT 2015 PCrLJ 308
• HASSAN ALI v. BAKHT SAWAB 2015 PCrLJ 332
• TARIQ JAMIL BANGASH v. ATTAULLAH KHAN KHATTAK 2015 MLD 343
• SPINZER TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD. v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION 2015 YLR 344
• AHMAD JAMIL QURESHI v. CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LTD. 2015 MLD 363

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

when you need a advocate from Tharparkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes