FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD QAISER HAYAT KHAN
Article 212 (3) A public servant was refused to be transferred to B-section 18 on the basis that he had received only average / annual intelligence reports in the last five years; I had a deadline. The case of Mohammad Anwar (PLD 1992 SC 144) that if a negative report against a public servant was not exposed and he received average information, he would usually have to behave well. The service tribunal followed such a rule and ordered the termination of civil servants. The service tribunal used the Supreme Court properly and, thus, no trial was sought to interfere with the decision of the leave of appeal of the service tribunal:
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
