MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus SECRETARY, LAW AND JUSTICE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Article 212 (3) appeals of public servants were dealt with because the respondent's department counsel's statement did not stress that the sanitary and fringe benefits of the public servant, including the allowable salary under the regulation, were protected by the civil. The question of seniority protection did not appear to have been paid by the employee and the threshold payment apparently did not appear to be a question of law by the employee, so, on the basis of the defendant's lawyer's admission on the matter, the service tribunal To dismiss the appeal which was not an appeal case, by the Service Tribunal to properly dispose of the matter Nor was it allowed to appeal under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
