HAJI NAZIR AHMAD VIRK versus THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE/RETURNING OFFICER, NA. 102, SHEIKHUPURA-II
Refusing to accept the papers nomination order of sections 12 and 14 representing the People Act 1976, the nomination papers of the candidate were challenged on the basis that the candidate did not enjoy good character and he was usually a person. Is known to have violated Islamic goals. He was a candidate defaulter and that he was detained by the Chief Election Commissioner under the list of defaulters' protection law submitted to the Returning Officer, under the precautionary law, the candidate was not named in the custody. There was an order of detention, which had already been challenged. The High Court was not one that could disqualify him from participating in the elections. In the absence of material brought to the record by an object relating to the candidate's role at the time of approval of the candidate's nomination, the Returning Officer rightly accepts the nomination of the candidate's papers.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
