KHURSHEED AHMED versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION
Article 212 (3) Appeal for leave of appeal of a civil servant has been essentially retired since 1984, upon which his retirement on appeal was changed by the Service Tribunal to the prevention of three increments. For any benefit and period for which he considered retiring as an unusual leave without pay, the civil servant again approached the service tribunal complaining that his permission to leave was denied and he was entitled. It was granted that the appeal of public servants was rejected from the date of default. The previous decision of the service tribunal was not challenged before the Supreme Court, it was not entitled to relief claiming the service break in the applicant's case and it was not transferred to the next party from the specified date and There are no annual intelligence reports. (He retired during that period) on the basis of which he could go on, he could not claim to move to the previous level in the next higher grade, the leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
