MUHAMMAD DIN versus MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH
Sections 100 and 115 Second Appeal / Revision High Court's jurisdiction under F jurisdiction to establish the coordination of judgments of the two courts under the exercise of jurisdiction of the two courts to seek the coordination of the two parties by the High Court either The Court of Appeal or Amendment could not be bothered; the courts below, when recording the findings of fact, either misread the evidence or ignored any evidence on the record, or it was a superior jurisdiction in which It was difficult to interfere with the unitary finding of facts in the jurisdiction of the review. It can only interfere with the subordinate court's orders on the grounds that the court below assumed jurisdiction over which it was not subordinated, or failed to exercise its jurisdiction listed there by law. Was or has been subjected to material irregularities affecting its jurisdiction. The matter can only correct the errors of the jurisdiction of the courts below the FAD in the amending jurisdiction that the High Court, while re-evaluating the evidence on record, came to a different conclusion which was reached by the two courts below. , Such food can never be found to justify interfering. On the basis of the evidence presented by the courts, a contentious finding of the affidavit submitted to them was also said that the order of the High Court was set aside while the trial court restored the verdict in the appeal. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Dhoun Kal lawyer