Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 23B, 23F & 38 (3a) Complaint against mill management The government has a request to appoint an auditor for the mill's audit accounts and the auditing company was formally designated by the government. Because the complaint was lodged against the management that it was resorting to all kinds of obstacles and obstacles to avoid the mill inspection and that the audit company was not providing facilities, the charges were denied by the court and the court rejected the matter. Considering the facts of the case and suspending the hearing by the accused management the auditing company acknowledged this in its own cross-examination. It was noted that during the audit, the auditing company itself approved the suspension, and after various delays, the auditing company did not contact the management by sending a letter to audit the mill complaint against the mill management. The court is being misunderstood
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
